Abstract
The system of education in the country remains influenced by colonial legacies, leading to cultural alienation, systemic inequities, and intellectual dependency. Drawing on Renato Constantino’s in-depth critique of how Filipinos were misled by American colonization, as detailed in his article The Miseducation of the Filipino, and incorporating insights from Ernest Gellner’s philosophical perspectives on higher education, this paper examines the persistent challenges within the system, and to address these issues, it discusses critical pedagogy and decolonial peace education. The analysis opens the idea that decolonial and participatory approach may lead to the enrichment of inclusivity, equity, and empowerment within the education system. To achieve this, possible recommendations for development shall be proposed to match the objectives of education to the goals of the nation with an emphasis on cultural pride.
Introduction
Decades of changes and so-called national development through the Philippine system of education have not eradicated the colonial mentality of Filipinos, the systemic inequities of the government, or outdated pedagogical approaches, which persist. The education system, rooted in colonizers and creating influences on Filipinos that shaped their perspectives about foreign ideologies, marginalizes indigenous culture and fosters dependency, as highlighted by Renato Constantino in The Miseducation of the Filipino. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to critically examine the challenges by incorporating Gellner’s critique of higher education and the theoretical frameworks of critical pedagogy and decolonial peace education. In addition, it provides possible solutions that could at least reduce the problem or ultimately decolonize the education system in the country to promote cultural pride, equity, and real democratization.
Contemporary Limits in Philippine Education: Colonial Heritage in the Curriculum
Renato Constantino criticized the education in the
country for being colonial and for encouraging intellectual reliance
and cultural inferiority, arguing that the American colonial education system deliberately shaped Filipinos to admire Western ideals and cultures while
undermining their own by promoting the English language and American history in
the Philippine curriculum, which created a sense of inferiority towards
Filipino identity and fostered intellectual dependence on Western knowledge.
Constantino quoted, "The educational system established by the Americans was a deliberate attempt to
mold Filipinos into a people who
would accept American domination not only politically but also intellectually and culturally"
(The Miseducation of the Filipino, 1966).
One of the best evidence of the predominance of
Western-centric curricula in the country's education can be seen in the
study of Ladrido-Ignacio et al.
(2007) which highlights that history books used in public schools tend to
provide minimal coverage of pre-colonial Philippine society and indigenous contributions to culture and governance
and focus extensively on colonial narratives, such as Spanish colonization and
American governance.
Another thing is the implementation of the K-12 curriculum, which sidelines regional languages and indigenous knowledge systems. While using English as the primary medium of instruction can undeniably be a one-way solution to prepare students for global opportunities, it leads to Filipinos forgetting the use and even losing the value of national identity.
Unequal Allocation of Resources and Methodological Deficiencies
It is visible that rural schools in the country, compared to schools near cities, often face challenges when it comes to teachers and facilities. Teachers' qualifications for teaching a certain subject are not aligned, which makes the teacher unqualified to teach the subject. Added to this are inadequate learning materials and poor infrastructure, which hinder both students and teachers from practicing and gaining better experience in learning a broader scope of knowledge, contributing to the rising problem of underachievement. According to Tan (2017), "Rural schools in the Philippines remain at a disadvantage due to limited access to resources, making it difficult for students to achieve academic success comparable to their urban counterparts."
This problem is still evident in the education system, as is the issue of pedagogical gaps, which limit students’ ability to develop critical thinking skills and creativity. A report by the Department of Education (2018) found that many teachers in the Philippines are still primarily trained in traditional, rote memorization methods, rather than in more innovative, participatory, and inclusive pedagogical approaches. The report states, "There is a growing need for teacher training programs that focus on inclusive and participatory teaching methods to address the evolving needs of students in diverse classrooms".
Theoretical and Philosophical Approaches Gellner's Critique of Colleges and Universities
In the Philippine context, there is a need to balance the cultural consciousness with the reason-based education, as Ernest Gellner's insights underscore the overcoming of neoliberal pressures and enriching integrity in education, which are both important in decolonizing the system of education in the Philippines. Universities and educational institutions are responsible for providing the universal truths through empirical investigation and reasoning. Also, Gellner critiqued how the neoliberal marketization of education prioritizes employability over intellectual development, and internal inconsistencies, such as the adoption of relativist ideologies that undermine the pursuit of objective knowledge.
Critical Peace Education through Decolonial Praxis
Dismantling colonial ideologies is possible through decolonial peace education that can lead to promoting justice in education, equity, and cultural relevance. If local knowledge systems are integrated with the use of participatory learning, this approach nurtures a sense of national identity and empowers marginalized communities. Moreover, it is worth noting that, discussing the roots historically, decolonial peace education addresses intergenerational trauma and contributes to social cohesion in the Philippines (Department of Education, 2015). For example, issues compounded by a Western-centric curriculum that often neglects or misrepresents local histories and indigenous contributions like land dispossession, cultural erasure, and limited access to culturally relevant education have been the problem of the country's indigenous groups such as Lumad, Aeta, and Mangyan. To revive the Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs), integrate indigenous languages and traditions into school curricula, and empower marginalized voices through participatory education that reflects the needs of these communities, there is a need to decolonize peace education.
The Democratic Process through Critical Education
Bridging the modern and even postmodern divide to emphasize inclusivity and democratization in education through critical pedagogy that challenges traditional, hierarchical teaching methods by fostering dialogue, participation, and critical inquiry. As a matter of fact, the Alternative Learning System (ALS) Program in the country is the primary example of critical pedagogy, which focuses on creating inclusive and democratic learning environments tailored to the diverse needs of learners who come from various socioeconomic backgrounds. This is another way to foster empowerment and critical thinking among students and even challenges the traditional and hierarchical methods of teaching. Also, integrating technology with innovative styles of teaching while still giving importance to the social and cultural realities of the students to create more equitable opportunities for all learners in the Philippines is one of the principles of critical pedagogy.
A Review of the Philippine Educational Sector: Challenges and Prospects Gellner's Insights on Education and Modernization
Rebalancing curriculum is an approach to creating individuals that create awareness about culture and critical thinking, as Gellner criticizes the educational institutions for having the responsibility of imposing neoliberalism with the educational system in the country that focuses mainly on employability and being globally competitive. This concern reflects Gellner's critique of universities as tools of neoliberalism, where education is utilized to meet the needs of the global market instead of developing well-rounded students who can think critically. One of the best examples of this is the government's initiative to implement the K-12 Basic Education Program. While its goal of matching the education system in the country with international standards and seeking to improve global competitiveness is good, especially now that people are becoming globally competitive, it primarily focuses on employability and market-driven skills, which have resulted in prioritizing subjects such as STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) that can boost employability, but the humanities and social sciences, which can foster critical thinking and cultural understanding, have received less attention. Therefore, a balanced curriculum should be offered to universities that is not only focused on the global good but also imparts critical perspectives to allow students to be aware of their cultural pride and enables them to think critically about the betterment of the country.
Decolonizing the Curriculum: Education for Equality and National Identity
The Philippine decolonial praxis includes breaking the influences on education, culture, and society from the colonizers with emphasis on indigenous knowledge, national values, and local histories. Decolonial praxis emphasizes the raising of national identity and reclaiming it from Spanish, American, and even Japanese colonizers to reshape government institutions and educational systems. This involves using mother tongue in schools to protect and preserve linguistic identity and diversity. Empowering the Filipino values of bayanihan while encouraging students to take pride in their heritage. In addition, this addresses issues like land rights and inclusivity of indigenous communities in the process of decision-making and creates a nation that values Filipino culture. Generally, this is a shift to strengthen the pride of the nation and eradicate the influence of colonial education. Through critical pedagogy, a participatory approach to learning where teachers will not feed the information to students but instead facilitate and guide students in learning, which ultimately boosts critical thinking skills. Moreover, development in the policy must put emphasis on even allocation of resources, which ends the gaps between urban and rural schools. Funding and training teachers will lead to quality education for Filipinos.
Conclusion
The education system of the country is shaped by colonial influences and keeps on promoting the western-based educational framework, putting aside the rich history of the Philippines and customs of Filipino citizens. This colonial power has caused uneven distribution of resources, specifically between schools within the city and outside. Also, this made the teaching pedagogy outdated as institutions focused mainly on rote memorization over creativity and critical thinking. This only points out the fact that the educational system in the country is greatly attached to colonial history, imposing dependency on foreign ideologies and not giving significance to local idols and cultural pride. To address these challenges, possible recommendations should be implemented to avoid further issues in the future. It is important to have a transformation toward a decolonized system of education. It can be done through utilizing indigenous wisdom, using the mother tongue in the school, and applying an inclusive and participatory teaching style. By doing these, a sense of nationality will be shared and possessed cultural pride. Critical pedagogy builds opportunities for education that are fair, and putting balance on the curriculum would allow Filipinos to be globally competitive and culturally proud to share and teach to generations to come, so Filipino heritage will be preserved and protected as time goes by.
References
- Constantino, R. (1966). The Miseducation of the Filipino. Manila: Foundation for Nationalist Studies.
- Department of Education. (2013). K to 12 General Information. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12
- Department of Education. (2015). Indigenous Peoples Education Program implementation review: Consolidated report. DepEd. https://www.deped.gov.ph
- Department of Education. (2018). Annual report on teacher training and pedagogical development. Department of Education.
- Department of Education. (2023). Alternative Learning System: A second chance at education. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/als
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
- Gellner, E. (1992). Philosophical and Social Thoughts on the University. (Extract in Document 16).
- Ladrido-Ignacio, L., De La Cruz, M., & Ignacio, K. (2007). Filipino identity in history education: Marginalization of local history and indigenous knowledge systems. Philippine Journal of Education, 86(1), 34-49.
- Santos, J. A. (2015). Toward a Decolonial Praxis in Critical Peace Education. Postcolonial Journal.
- Tan, R. (2017). Inequity in resource distribution: The gap between urban and rural schools in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 91(2), 43-58.